This discussion includes Alocasia zebrina, "Alocasia Reticulata", Alocasia tigrina and Alocasia 'Tigrina Superba'.
Only Alocasia zebrina is an accepted published scientific name
Warning: Florida Hill Nursery of Debary, FL is currently using
the first photo below to he left of the text
Alocasia zebrina Schott ex Van
Including the sport
Alocasia zebrina reticulata form
Incorrectly Alocasia zebrina cv. reticulata or Alocasia reticulata
Alocasia zebrina Schott ex Van
The second photo shown above is often sold incorrectly as a unique species called Alocasia zebrina Reticulata.
No such species exists in science.
None of the following names are scientifically recognized nor have any been officially registered as horticultural cultivars.
All appear to be names created for commercial purposes without following the established rules of horticulture:
Alocasia zebrina 'Reticulata', Alocasia zebrina cv Reticulata, Alocasia Tigrina Superba,
and Alocasia zebrina Superba are only unregistered sports of the species Alocasia zebrina.
Published in 1863, Alocasia zebrina (alo-CAY-see-ee) is exclusively found (endemic) to a single island in the Philippines. The reticulated leaf form which has a pattern on the leaf blades appears to be an unusual variation of the species that has not been found in nature. Alocasia zebrina reticulata form simply possesses the unusual leaf reticulation with a more elongated blade shape. Other forms including one sold commercially as Alocasia Tigrina also demonstrate the elongated leaf blade. As the blades of the reticulated variation mature the pattern fades until it is barely noticeable.
The species Alocasia zebrina is
found on the island of Luzon in primary rain forests at elevations
of 100 to 400 meters (330 to 1,300 feet). A. zebrina
found in nature growing in wet humus covered soil adjacent to boulders in the shade
Alocasia zebrina is known to be a highly variable species which is capable of producing more than one leaf form. Variation is common among aroid species but as aroid expert Julius Boos explains later in this article variation is especially prominent within the genus Alocasia. Botanists including Australian Alistair Hay have been working to reclassifying numerous specimens previously thought to be individual species into single merged names as a result of natural variation. Some of these advances are as a result of the increased use of DNA to explore the genetic makeup of plant specimens which will result in some previously accepted scientific names being sunk into synonymy under other species' names.
The leaf blades of Alocasia zebrina typically measure 30 to 38 cm (12 to 15 inches) long with a width of 20 cm (just less than 8 inches) wide near the base but may grow larger. The blades are cordate sagittate to sagittate in shape and are are coriaceous to the touch. The botanical term cordate indicates a leaf that is heart shaped while sagittate indicates a blade that has the shape of an arrow. As a result the arrow shaped leaf blades of both the reticulated form and the form sold as Tigrina are not uncommon in this species. The coloration of the leaf blade is normally light green on the upper side known as the adaxial surface while being paler on the underside known as the abaxial surface. Both the petiole and the lower midrib possess the zebra-striped characteristic. The midrib is the central vein or support for any leaf blade (see photo below).
Just as humans with different body shapes and sizes as well as skin, eye, or hair color are not different species, difference in the blade appearance alone is insufficient evidence to presume a plant is a unique species. What truly determines a unique aroid species are distinct characteristics of the plant including the venation (vein structure), stem and petiole as well as the sexual portions of each species' inflorescence.
Those sexual characteristics appear to be one and the same in Alocasia zebrina, the Alocasia zebrina reticulata form as well as all the other forms of this species sometimes offered for sale. Both the Alocasia zebrina reticulata form and the form sold as Alocasia Tigrina Superba appear to be nothing more than sports of the scientifically described species Alocasia zebrina.
It also appears the insistence on the part of some to grant a completely different name to any plant that has slight variations in leaf form, pattern or color may be only a conflict between horticulture and science due to the known variations within this species. However, the Alocasia zebrina reticulata form does remain somewhat of a mystery since the true origin of the plant is not known. This form has not been observed in the wild.
Even more unfortunate is
the fact many grower/sellers also often attempt to display the name in italics
or give the plant a Latin sounding name. The use of
Latinized names or italics is reserved for scientifically
described species and is not
an accepted practice for commercial plant names.
It appears some grower/sellers would prefer to completely throw out
the rules of either botanical science or horticulture causing a
great deal of confusion among plant collectors.
There are rules in both science and horticulture that dictate the proper use of names. Many of the names often used for this specimen do not fall within those rules! Horticultural texts sometimes try to call this specimen Alocasia zebrina cv. 'Reticulata' but according to recognized experts including horticulturist Derek Birch the name Alocasia zebrina reticulata form appears to be the only name that currently can be used while complying with the rules of horticulture.
Here's a great example as explained by my friend Derek who is the editor of the International Aroid Society journal, Aroideana and supervises the IAS cultivar registration, "the prefix “cv.” is no longer valid to indicate a cultivar. The only way of writing a cultivar name is now in roman script with capital letters for the words and inside single quotation marks. So when you write “Incorrectly Alocasia zebrina cv. reticulata”, the response is “yes, but it would be incorrect even if it were written Alocasia zebrina ‘reticulata’, which would be correct for a registered cultivar name apart from the Latinized form of the name”.
A cultivar is a naturally produced sport of a known species which has been properly registered with a governing authority such as the IAS. If you do an internet search you can easily find specimens which are variable forms of Alocasia zebrina being offered for sale under the names Alocasia 'reticulata' and Alocasia 'Tigrina Superba' in single quotes even though no such cultivar has been registered. Aroid expert Julius Boos explains further, "Aroids, in particular the genera Alocasia appear to sometimes morph spontaneously into new cultivars. This happens even under natural conditions. The name reticulata was never registered as a cultivar. Latinized names cannot be used as cultivar names except if the Latin name is a species name or is registered. As a result, cv cannot be used as it has never become a registered cultivar. Using the word reticulata as a Latinized name is also improper!"
Alocasia species are known to be highly variable and not every leaf of every specimen will always appear the same. This link explains in non-scientific language the details of natural variation and morphogenesis. Click here In a message from Alocasia botanist Lord Alistair Hay if you attempt to locate any of these names on one of the major scientific databases you will learn none exists in the world of science. Despite the fact grower/sellers would apparently like for collectors to believe they are scientifically accepted they are not scientific. In some references it appears the name reticulata dates back to grower Bob Wilson of Fantastic Gardens once in business in Miami, FL during the 1980's but the term reticulata can be found in plant literature preceding Wilson's sale of the plant.
As aroid botanist Dr. Tom Croat explained in one of his published papers, natural changes are simply the nature of plant evolution. A very interesting quote can be found within Dr. Croat's and Monica Carlen's Taxonomic Revision of the Section Semaeophyllium in regard to Anthurium species states, "Size of any morphological structure in Anthurium is highly variable because plants often change remarkably in size over the course of their lives and also in response to the general climatic conditions where they occur, particularly in geographically widespread species. Habit, Stem, and Cataphylls". The size of the leaf, the shape of the leaf, the size of the spathe, the size of almost any feature of any aroid can be variable. Size and leaf shape does not determine a plant species!
This information by botanist Alistair Hay points to the problems caused by plant grower/sellers when they improperly cause collectors to confuse a common name with a scientific name, "I think this is a mess! Not your page, just the general situation re this name. First, is it really a sport - i.e. a vegetative mutant growing out of and taken from something else. I would have thought direct evidence of this status would be required. I suspect it is a variant seedling of A. zebrina, though of course it could be hybrid of some sort. Second, as far as I can see (and as you say) this species name seems never to have been published properly. I just tried searching the IPNI database but it keeps timing out, but I don't recall seeing this name as a valid species name when I was looking at Alocasia in detail. Third, I don't think it can be valid as a cultivar name. Latin species names can only be transferred across as cultivar names if it can be demonstrated that the originally published "species" is a cultivar. If, as we suspect, this has never been validly published as a species name, it is invalid as a cultivar name simply because it is Latin. Fourth, if the plant was released as a cultivar with a "pseudo species" name, it should be re-named properly (i.e. with an English or other modern language epithet and published with a description and pic either with the introducer's consent, or not, if someone has released a cultivar with an invalid name, they have had their shot at it and it would be open to anyone to rename the plant, though I do think that should be done properly: i.e. publishing it in either Aroideana or the IAS Newsletter with a pic and description. These sort of messy situations need a formal determination by the ICRA and possibly consultation with the ISHS commission for cultivar registration and nomenclature." IPNI refers to the International Plant Names Index and ISHS refers to the International Society for Horticultural Science.
The confusion appears to date back some years. Alistair pointed out, "I searched Google books for Alocasia reticulata and got only one result which can't be viewed, but the name allegedly appears in Wood, Allen H. (1941), Try These Indoors, Published by Hale, Cushman and Flint." "Try Those Indoors" was a book about houseplants.
The name reticulata was again briefly described as a variation of Alocasia in the 1983 International Aroid Society journal Aroideana, Volume 7, numbers 3 and 4 by David Burnett where he appears to use Alocasia 'reticulata' only as a horticultural name. David wrote, "This plant seems to have been released by Fantastic Gardens, Florida, sometime in the last ten years. It is still uncommon in the USA and virtually unknown elsewhere. It's origins are, so far as I can determine, unknown. I doubt that it is a species and it is not likely be be a hybrid. Perhaps it is simply a sport or varietal form of a species. I have placed it among the Philippine Alocasia for reasons that I find extremely difficult to explain in words. Somehow the plant evokes a relationship with A. zebrina and A. 'Tigrina Superba', yet; some of its characteristics are distinct from both. I have not had sufficient experience with the plant to describe it, so I shall let the photograph speak for itself for the time being." In his discussion David offered no measurements and no definitive information.
Following my request for information from members of the aroid discussion group Aroid l, I received this response from former IAS president, Scott Hyndman, "When I first saw this Alocasia at the now long ago closed Fantastic Gardens Nursery of Miami in 1981 it was sold as Alocasia zebrina cv reticulata." However, as Julius explained early in this article, the use of "cv" in relation to this plant is improper since no such cultivar has ever been registered.
All Alocasia species are members of the larger plant
family known as Araceae
(uh-RAY-see ee) commonly called aroids. An aroid is a plant that
reproduces via the production of an inflorescence which is
known to science as a spathe and spadix. The inflorescence is
supported by a stalk known as a peduncle.
individuals try to call the inflorescence a "flower" the spathe is
closer to being a "flower holder". The spathe is a modified leaf or
bract that surrounds the spadix which truly holds the flowers.
The flowers of Araceae are very small and grow along
the spadice's length which is a spike on a thickened fleshy axis. If
you explore the spadix with a magnifying glass when it is at sexual
anthesis and is ready to be pollinated you can see the near
Due to natural variation the blades and spathe may not always appear exactly the same from specimen to specimen. Additional information from aroid hybridizer LariAnn Garner noted, "While the inflorescences are very similar, the leaf texture is markedly different from both "reticulata" and "tigrina". The petioles are more definitively striped rather than just coarsely mottled, as "tigrina" and "reticulata" are. The leaf blades have a thickness, almost a leathery texture, that both of the others lack completely. The leaves are discolorous (upper surface and lower surface different shades of green), which is similar to "tigrina" but unlike "reticulata", whose leaves are concolorous, and the venation is not prominent at all. The width of the leaf blades is significantly greater, especially in mature specimens, than in either of the other two. If you saw all three plants side by side, you'd likely conclude that "reticulata" is a sport of "tigrina", not zebrina!"
At present, adequate scientific information has simply not been published to determine a positive status for Alocasia zebrina reticulata form. It does certainly appear the specimen is a variation of Alocasia zebrina, but lacking verified evidence published by a qualified botanical scientist, a scientific determination appears not yet complete. This is one of Alistair's most recent messages, "As I said, the botanical reticulata could be used as the cultivar epithet as in Alocasia 'reticulata', provided the species or variety name was given to this clone (i.e. it is equivalent to a cv) and not to a range of similar clones. However, to qualify for that, it must go back in its usage to prior to Jan 1 1959. If it is later than that, it cannot be used as the cv name. It seems pretty clear that this is not a distinct species, and botanical variety is just not an appropriate category for a horticultural thing like this: it needs to be given a cv name!" And in one final email Lord Alistair had this comment, "A. tigrina has no botanical merit and is simply a particularly attractive form of zebrina which should be recognized as a cultivar if it is a clone. The same applies as before, if it is a clone and the name has been published before 1959 in a way which meets the conditions for establishment of a cultivar name, then it can be transferred across as a cultivar name Alocasia 'Tigrina'. Ditto 'Tigrina Superba'. However, I have tended to take a rather conservative view of species definitions in Alocasia - i.e. not splitting off slight variations as species, and others might disagree. The view of Aroid botanists in the Philippines may be different!"
For now, It appears best to
call the reticulated variation of this plant Alocasia
zebrina reticulata form. As Alistair noted, the name
for this specimen "is
This post made July 9, 2008 on Aroid l by
Pete Boyce offers some insight,
you know, Alistair Hay in his herbarium-based account of
Philippines' Alocasia (Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 51: 1-41 (1999))
treated A. zebrina as a variable species and included under that
name A. wenzelii. He made no mention of the name A. tigrina (or A.
zebrina tigrina) as this name and any combination thereof has never
been formally published and thus from a strict botanical standpoint
dos not exist. Goerverts et al. include a further name as a
provisional syn. (A. liervalii) but without further discussion.
Not withstanding the strict application of published
names it is clear to anyone who grows A. zebrina that there are
several conspicuously different (but likewise clearly allied)
entities in cultivation, among which the form with reticulated
venation is particularly striking. What of course is needed is a
comprehensive field study to try to untangle these cultivated clones
and see where they may have originated."
My thanks to aroid expert Julius Boos for his assistance as well as to Pete Boyce and LariAnn Garner http://aroidiaresearch.org/ My sincere appreciation to Alistair Hay for checking this page and offering his valuable input.
Although the parent species Alocasia zebrina is now apparently rare as a result of over collection in the wild this specimen is commonly available to collectors due to the process of tissue culture (cloning).
One personal note
of explanation: Lord Alistair Hay legitimately possesses his title as a
result of family heritage. He rarely uses the title with his
name but some in the aroid community have referred to Alistair, now
retired, as Sir
Hay. He recently informed me in a personal email he is not a "Sir".
Those of us that appreciate Alistair's work use the title due to our
respect for what he has done for the study of aroid botany.
If you are seeking information on other rare species, click on "Aroids and other genera in the Collection" at the top and look for the
Join the International Aroid Society: http://www.exoticrainforest.com/Join%20IAS.html
Out of print copies of Aroideana can often be ordered directly from the International Aroid Society: http://www.aroid.org/